Posted by Spanner on Apr 30, 2010 00:22 (Apr 30, 2010 00:22)
When is a sequel not a sequel? Jet Set Willy is both the question and the answer. This is, technically and without reservation, the sequel to Manic Miner. It looks the same, it's got the same main character, the gameplay is pretty much identical and the author, Matthew Smith, says it's the sequel. And yet, it isn't.
To craft a game of this magnitude and surrealism is a historic accomplishment, regardless of its slippery heritage. But we have very specific expectations from sequels, whether they're games, films, book or whatever. It must exhibit recognisable gameplay and at the same time be different, bigger and more challenging while expanding on the main character's universe and personal history. It might have been 1984, but we still expected these elements when Miner Willy returned to our Spectrum driven screens.
The wonderfully unwell mind of Smith was more than prepared, however; attacking our expectations from the side and bowling them over, unaware and unprepared. This isn't a continuation in the life of Miner Willy, but another chapter - an alternative glance at the warped universe of an inexplicably alluring character who, in this instance, simply wants to go to bed after a particularly rampant party at his massive new 60-room mansion.
His vitriolic house keeper blocks his way to convivial slumber, and Willy must do her job (clean up) before well earned retirement. As with all good literature (yes, I consider Jet Set Willy to be a form of interactive, graphic literature on a par with Gabriel Marquez and Angel Carter), Willy's story is shown, concisely and profoundly, rather than told.
The two most important aspects of character identification are "want" and "need", and seldom in the history of games have these vitalities been better portrayed than in Jet Set Willy - precisely the reason we're so inexplicable drawn toward his games and consider his progenitor to be on a different creative level to us mortals who play the games.
I love JSW. I really, really do. It's one of those iconic games that NEEDS to be loved, a bit like Space Invaders. It just feels right.
However, upon closer scrutiny, is it worthy of our devotion? That, as they say, is the million dollar question because, deep down, it's so very blinkin' hard to make any signifcant progress that you get pretty much zero sense of achievement from JSW. Repeat plays and "learning the rooms" also seems to make no difference. It's one of those rifts in the social fabric. There's nothing NOT to love, so we lavish praise upon it's genius in heaps. A bit like those tripods from the BBC series from the same year (1984) called umm... The Tripods.
So is JSW deserving of it's place in history? Hmm yes. Is it a good game? Arguably not, but I wouldn't fight the big boy in school over it.
But do I love it, do we all love it and should we all hail the tripods? YEAH BABY YEAH!!
Apr 30, 2010 21:20:32 (
Apr 30, 2010 21:20
)
